Blogs Classifieds Downloads FlashChat Gallery Googlemap Invite Friends Links Projects Reviews Wiki
 


Welcome to the pSeries Tech Forums, our free peer-based support site for administrators, engineers and architects working with IBM pSeries servers and software.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles, tutorials and access our other free features. By joining our community you will be able to collaborate with administrators, engineers and architects charged with designing, delivering or maintaining IBM pSeries server environments.

Founded by a recognized IBM pSeries consultant and IBM Redbook author, pSeries Tech Forums was developed with the single mission of bringing IBM pSeries professionals together into a single self-help community.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free to all IT professionals with responsibility for or interest in IBM pSeries servers. We invite you to join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

Our Sponsors
Want to advertise?  


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old November 10th, 2006
gbarth's Avatar
gbarth Offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: August 2006
Posts: 4
VIO Disk Performance

We have been doing some VIO disk I/O performance testing recently (disk is LUN from SAN) and getting the follwoing results

The VIO server partiton gets 350MBPS through put.
The AIX client partiton gets 220MBPS through put.

therefore access to the same LUN gets a 37% performance reduction from the AIX client. I assume there would be some overhead, but nothing on this scale.

Has anyone seen this before ?

Thanks.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 10th, 2006
steevojb's Avatar
steevojb Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 2006
Location: manchester, england
Posts: 185
Re: VIO Disk Performance

Hi

Interesting,

I will run the same test

What method are you using to write data ?
What is your SAN, what RAID configuration do you have ?

Regards

Steve
__________________
Take your time and think things through !!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old November 10th, 2006
gbarth's Avatar
gbarth Offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: August 2006
Posts: 4
Re: VIO Disk Performance

hi steve,

the test is reading data with the dd command from /dev/rhdisk2

san is DS6800 (RAID5)

thanks in advance !!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 23rd, 2006
m_seger's Avatar
m_seger Offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 2006
Location: St. Gallen, Switzerland
Posts: 12
Re: VIO Disk Performance

I have also run some quick tests with SAN Disks (DS4200) under VIO and
under LPAR.

VIO writes 512MB in 7sec. (dd if=/dev/zero) and LPAR needs
for the same tests 10sec. So I also have around 30% degradation!

This p570 is not doing anything else, it still smells like a new car ;-)
__________________
-----------------------------------------
Goalies speak softly, but carry a big stick
-----------------------------------------
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 27th, 2006
dthacker's Avatar
dthacker Offline
Cat Herder and Penguin Wrangler
 
Join Date: June 2006
Location: Omaha, Nebraska USA
Posts: 86
Send a message via Yahoo to dthacker
Re: VIO Disk Performance

Which one has higher CPU priority?

Dave
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 28th, 2006
m_seger's Avatar
m_seger Offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: October 2006
Location: St. Gallen, Switzerland
Posts: 12
Re: VIO Disk Performance

@Dave

What do you mean with CPU Priority? Where can I check/change it?

Both Systems are "default" Installation with no parameters changed.

The VIO has an uncapped CPU, with max weight and there is nothing else
running on that system. So either an LPAR with direct attached FC Adapter
or a VIO with FC Adapter and an LPAR that uses VIO Resources was running.

I also get faster troughoutput with an old H50.

Cheers Mike
__________________
-----------------------------------------
Goalies speak softly, but carry a big stick
-----------------------------------------
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old January 8th, 2007
sberube's Avatar
sberube Offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: January 2007
Posts: 4
Re: VIO Disk Performance

A few other things you wanna make sure of are...

1. that you have a min and max CPU for your VIO that are reasonable values (say 0.2 and 2 with an uncap weight of say 240... actually anything that's at least 30-50% higher than your other partitions so that if they are competing for processing resources, the VIO gets it. The rational behind this is if your VIO doesn't have any resources, none of your partitions can do anything).

2. that you have a number of virtual processor at least equal to your max cpu entitlement (if you have 1 vp and a max cpu of 2, you'll never be able to use more than 1 proc with your VIO).

3. try doing the test by sharing the lun directly to the partition (mkvdev -vdev hdiskX -vadapter vhostX -dev yadiyadiya) AND by sharing a LV to your partition (mkvdev -vdev SomeLV -vadapter vhostX -dev yadiyadiyaLV). If you are currently configured to share a drive that's under a VG and an LV in the VIO, your adding a bit of overhead you don't really need/want in this type of configuration.

Hopefully this can help!

Cheers.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old January 8th, 2007
ross.mather's Avatar
ross.mather Offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 2007
Location: Nomadic in the UK
Posts: 394
Re: VIO Disk Performance

A couple of thing sthat may help:

1. As per above from sberube, are there Logical volumes defined on the LUN at VIOS level or is the LUN directly connected through?

2. Are you using MPIO or SDD?

3. In the VIO Setup are you using multiple Fiber Channel Cards?

cheers
Ross
__________________
Ross Mather, IBM AIX IT Specialist.
That said anything I say here is my own opinion and not anything that you can ever hold against IBM.
Ohhh and don't forget that I make mistakes too....
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

These are the 100 most searched terms
Search Cloud
0042-001 0042-001 nim 0513-001 the system resource controller daemon is not active 0513-001 the system resource controller daemon is not active. 0514-061 0514-061 cannot find a child device 0514-061 cannot find a child device. 0516-787 0516-787 extendlv 0516-787 extendlv: maximum allocation for logical volume 110000ac aa00e1f3 aio aix aix aio aix freeware aixif_arp_dup_addr b150f22a b181fb53 ba010004 c1001020 d133c002 dacnone dcb47997 dlpar fcp_array_err6 fget_config gnu tar aix gsclvmd gtar aix hi yall hmc root password hmc vmware hscl05db ibm p6 ibm p6 520 libpopt aix libpopt.a libpopt.a(libpopt.so.0) is needed by rsync-2.6.2-1 migratelv mksysb navisphere agent nim server pseries pseriestech rsync aix sc_disk_err4 scan_error_chrp vio server websm xhost file ... powered by Simple Search Cloud


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
32Bit-Kernel VIO installation fails for large disk array xcreepx IBM PowerVM Editions 2 April 9th, 2007 08:45
Boot for two VIO servers impossible with only one SCSI Controller alecks84 IBM PowerVM Editions 7 March 31st, 2007 09:48
Vio Client san disk allocation datamax IBM PowerVM Editions 2 February 21st, 2007 03:43
vio server: san (2 mirror disk) some questions? Melih IBM PowerVM Editions 2 February 15th, 2007 13:01
VIO Backup Strategy steevojb AIX for POWER Systems 1 August 30th, 2006 10:38



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Powered by vbWiki Pro 1.3 RC5. Copyright ©2006-2007, NuHit, LLC

vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48