| Blogs | Classifieds | Downloads | FlashChat | Gallery | Googlemap | Invite Friends | Links | Projects | Reviews | Wiki |
| |||||||||
Welcome to the pSeries Tech Forums,
our free peer-based support site for administrators, engineers and architects working with IBM pSeries servers and software. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles, tutorials and access our other free features. By joining our community you will be able to collaborate with administrators, engineers and architects charged with designing, delivering or maintaining IBM pSeries server environments. Founded by a recognized IBM pSeries consultant and IBM Redbook author, pSeries Tech Forums was developed with the single mission of bringing IBM pSeries professionals together into a single self-help community. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free to all IT professionals with responsibility for or interest in IBM pSeries servers. We invite you to join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support. |
| Our Sponsors | |
| | |
| Want to advertise? | |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| I have 2 VIO servers on my p595 for redundency running powerpath on the VIO's and MPIO on the virtual partitions. When defining the partitions I allocated alternate partitions to alternate VIO's to spread the workload. Is there anyway to allow dynamic workload balancing between VIO servers as the current system is imbalanced. I have 35 partitions allocated to each VIO so manual tuning is needed Thanks Markus
__________________ I think therefore I am.......I think |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
MPIO support for load balancing is not available at this time (to my knowledge). Although we are looking forward to it. Here is a snipit from /techsupport.services.ibm.com/server/vios/documentation/sptiDualVIOServerswp.pdf MPIO Path Management The MPIO support over virtual SCSI between the client partition and the dual VIO Servers only supports failover mode. The client partition will use a primary path to one VIO Server and failover to the secondary path to use the other VIO Server. Only one path is used at a given time even though both paths may be enabled. To balance the load of multiple client partitions across dual VIO Servers, the priority can be set to select the primary path and therefore a specific VIO Server for each client partition. The priority is set on a per virtual SCSI disk drive basis so all the disks or alternate disks on a client partition can use one of the VIO Servers. The recommended method is to divide the client partitions between the two VIO Servers. |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
This is a problem we discovered. The customer wanted the two VIO Server's to be load balanced, but unfortunatley it was not possible with MPIO under VIO. We ended up spreading the LPAR's evenly across the two VIO Servers. Ben
__________________ IBM Certified Specialist - pSeries and p5 |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AIX 5.2 and VIO servers | Koetje | IBM PowerVM Editions | 3 | June 26th, 2007 03:13 |
| Vio servers | gileb | IBM PowerVM Editions | 2 | April 12th, 2007 01:52 |
| Boot for two VIO servers impossible with only one SCSI Controller | alecks84 | IBM PowerVM Editions | 7 | March 31st, 2007 09:48 |
| Where to configure IP address on VIO servers | cccompton | IBM PowerVM Editions | 3 | January 9th, 2007 11:49 |
| 2 VIO servers and a HP san | Koetje | IBM PowerVM Editions | 6 | December 6th, 2006 03:27 |